O
West Sacramento
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Massage business ordinance

West Sacramento

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 18, 2026.

Public comments (2)

MixedNita MinisMar 18, 2026

Objected to the word 'parlors' as stigmatizing, asked that the ordinance read 'massage therapy businesses,' urged scrapping the $3,000 per-employee fee, and asked for future items published in Mandarin.

City Council — March 18, 2026 · 2:33:02 →
OpposedGuy StevensonMar 18, 2026

Alleged most massage parlors are fronts for prostitution and human trafficking, urged a dedicated enforcement team, and said they shouldn't be near churches or schools.

City Council — March 18, 2026 · 2:36:35 →